Chemical contamination as a violation of children’s rights law in the EU

 

Binding obligations

The EU is in serial breach of a wide range of children’s rights enshrined in UN and European treaties by which its member states are bound. These include the following:

  • Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) identifies the promotion and protection of children's rights as a principal objective of the bloc and its member states.103
  • The UNCRC, binding on all EU member states, recognises in law children’s civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights. Severally and jointly, these rights unambiguously preclude the chemical contamination of children, their families, and their environment. These principles must guide the work of the European Commission.104
  • The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), binding on all EU member states, sets minimum standards for the rights of people with disabilities, including children.105
  • The UN Aarhus Convention, binding on the EU and its member states, guarantees access to information, public participation in decision-making, and access to justice in environmental matters.
  • The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR),106 binding on 46 states including all EU members, guarantees a wide range of rights that are jeopardised by chemical contamination.
  • As a counterpart to the ECHR, the European Social Charter (ESC)107 guarantees fundamental social and economic rights, particularly civil and political rights.
  • The Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the EU (EU Charter), enshrines a wide range of human rights and, in Article 24, specifically children’s rights. The Charter’s provisions bind the EU institutions and bodies in all their actions, as well as all national authorities when implementing EU law.

By ratifying these treaties, the EU and its member states recognise that children hold rights and commit to take measures to guarantee them in practice. This may involve reforming laws, providing resources and services, monitoring the impacts of social and environmental conditions on children, and developing institutions to promote and protect their rights more effectively.108 Regrettably, the EU’s approach to chemical regulations has tended to overlook these instruments and commitments.109

Of special relevance is the EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child adopted in 2021.110 This strategy focuses mainly on the realisation of rights enshrined in the UNCRC, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),111 and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. We have used the strategy’s themes,112 with the addition of other instruments such as the Aarhus Convention and the European Social Charter, to construct a comprehensive, though not exhaustive, framework by which to examine the impact of hazardous chemicals on the rights of children.

 

Interconnections between respect of the children’s rights framework and the fight against exposure to hazardous chemicals must better inform developing legislation in the EU and its member states.

 

Rights infringements: An overview of the evidence

Overarching principle: Children’s best interests

Children's rights

UNCR:

• Art. 1: Definition of the child.

• Art. 2: Non-discrimination.

• Art. 3: Best interests of the child.

• Art. 6: Right to life, survival, and development.

• Art. 23: Children with disabilities and measures taken to ensure their dignity, self-reliance and active participation in the community, through access to all kinds of services, transportation and institutions, and in particular to education and cultural activities.

• Art. 25: Right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health.

• Art. 30: Children belonging to a minority or an indigenous group.

UNCRPD:

• Art. 7: Inclusion of children with disabilities and the principle of nondiscrimination.

ECHR:

• Art. 1: Obligation to respect human rights.

• Art. 2: Right to life.

• Art. 14: Prohibition of discrimination.

European Social Charter:

• Art. 11: Right to protection of health.

• Art. 13: Right to social and medical assistance.

• Art. 15: Right of persons with disabilities to independence, social integration and participation in the life of the community.

• Art. 16: Right of the family to social, legal and economic protection.

• Art. 17: Right of children and young persons to social, legal and economic protection.

• Art. 30: Right to protection against poverty and social exclusion.

• Art. 31: Right to housing (of an "adequate standard" that implies housing meeting acceptable standards in regard to health requirements).

• Part V, Article E: Non-discrimination.

EU Charter:

• Art. 2: Right to life.

• Art. 20: Equality before the law.

• Art. 21: Non-discrimination.

• Art. 23: Equality between women and men.

• Art. 24: The rights of the child (including Art. 24.2: Best interests of the child, and Art. 24.1.1: Right of the child to protection and care).

• Art. 26: Integration of persons with disabilities.

SDGs:

• Target 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere.

• Target 5.c: Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation for the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at all levels.

• Target 10.2: Empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status.

• Target 10.3: Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies, and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies, and action in this regard.


Connections between children's rights and exposure to hazardous chemicals

States and the EU are asked to put measures in place to allow children to survive into adulthood in conditions optimal for their development, including through combating child mortality, and providing healthcare, nutrition, sanitation and drinking water.

Available information 113 speaks volumes on the risks harmful chemicals entail for children. Their exposure to hazardous chemicals have long-term and irreversible adverse effects on their health. Harmful impacts on children’s health range from metabolic, endocrine and reproductive disorders, to diabetes, obesity, cancers and neurological deficiencies. Such exposure to hazardous chemicals violates children’s rights, and those impacts have been internationally recognised.

Families and communities also need to be provided with the necessary support so that they can ensure children’s wellbeing and development.

The EU must also respect and uphold the EU Charter, introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, thus binding all member states with the same legal value as EU treaties. Article 24 114 guarantees and protects the rights and best interest of the child, including the right to protection and care. In all actions relating to children, whether taken by public authorities or private institutions, the child's best interests must be a primary consideration.

Moreover, the UNCRC must guide EU action. Harmful exposure to hazardous chemicals unambiguously violates a wide range of children’s rights set out in the UNCRC. The UNCRC recognises the right of all children to have the best possible start in life, to grow up healthy, and to develop to their full potential. 115 In all actions concerning children, “whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration”. 116

In his report focusing on children’s rights in 2016, the former Special Rapporteur on toxics Baskut Tuncak provided a full analysis of children’s rights that are impacted by toxic chemicals, including the best interests of the child. 117 He emphasised that the UNCRC makes it clear that States have an obligation to prevent exposure to toxics by children. He reminded that businesses must ensure their products do not contain toxic or otherwise hazardous substances and deplored that industrial competitiveness, risk management options and cost-benefit considerations are prioritised over the best interests of the child.

In the Resolution on the realisation of the rights of the child through a healthy environment, the UN Human Rights Council urged the States to ensure the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, by inter alia: [...] Identifying and eliminating sources of exposure of children to substances of high concern, such as heavy metals and EDCs.118

In 2022, the Special Rapporteur on toxics Marcos Orellana warned that the use of plastic products exposes children to endocrine disrupting chemicals in toys or utensils and that the growing volumes of plastic waste impose a debt on future generations. He outlined that hazardous chemicals added to plastics can also disrupt human procreation and even damage human DNA. As such, “exposure of pregnant women to such hazardous substances can affect the health of their descendants.”119

In 2023, the Committee on the Rights of the Child released General Comment 26 on children's rights and the environment. This highly anticipated guidance to states urged them to “address the adverse effects of environmental degradation, with a special focus on climate change, on the enjoyment of children’s rights,” including the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment. It acknowledged that younger children are particularly susceptible to environmental hazards, and that the effects of environmental contaminants may even persist in future generations. According to the Committee, States should consistently and explicitly consider the impact of exposure to toxic substances and pollution in early life.120 They should “consider all factors required for children of all different ages to survive, develop and thrive to their fullest potential and design and implement evidence-based interventions that address a wide range of environmental determinants during the life course.”121


Case study: Preterm birth and infant mortality after exposure to hazardous chemicals

Continuous exposure to thousands of chemicals throughout children’s early life is associated with violations to the right to life, survival, and development. Early-age exposure to hazardous substances is linked to adverse impacts on reproductive systems of individuals, and can thus hamper their capacity to have children.

Scientific studies conducted on preterm birth and infant mortality outlined the link between early exposure to hazardous substances and increased risks of preterm delivery as well as infant mortality.

Preterm birth is now the leading cause of child mortality, accounting for more than 1 in 5 deaths under five years old.122 In Europe, about 500,000 babies are born prematurely every year.123

Preterm survivors can face lifelong health consequences, with an increased likelihood of disability and developmental delays. This could be prevented inter alia by reducing exposure to endocrine disruptors and, more particularly, bisphenol A, phthalates, organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides, polybromines, lead.124 In the case of phthalates, a recent study shows that halving the exposure of pregnant women reduces the risk of preterm birth by 12%.125

17% of European children and adolescents are at risk fromcombined exposure to mixtures of phthalates, a substance linked to developmental and reproductive illnesses.126 “All young people tested were found polluted, with around a quarter in one study beyond the level of health concern”, the HBM4EU study found. Phthalates are a group of industrial chemicals that are linked to a range of adverse health effects on sexual function, fertility, the reproductive system, and the prenatal and postnatal development. There is concern for children with regard to testicular effects, fertility, and toxicity to kidneys.

Children are exposed to several hazardous substances present in articles which should be particularly formulated and designed to be completely safe for babies, infants and children.

For instance, baby diapers are reportedly known to contain very harmful substances, including formaldehyde, PAHs, dioxins, and furans. Data showed that 90% of European babies (i.e., 14.5 million babies) are being exposed to hazardous chemicals contained in their diapers every year.127 The French Agency for food, occupational and environmental health and safety (ANSES) found 38 very hazardous substances, including EDCs, in diapers sold in Europe.128

NGOs, experts, politicians, and national agencies called on the EU to take action129 but the restriction on several hazardous substances in baby diapers proposed by ANSES130 was dropped by the EU in 2021.131 While the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) recognised that these substances present potential risks and should not be present in baby diapers, the Agency concluded that the French authority proposing their restrictions failed to properly demonstrate a risk to children.132

Since this decision of the EU to not restrict several hazardous chemicals from baby diapers, children continue to be contaminated on a daily basis with harmful substances those products contain and which are linked with irreversible impacts on their health and lives.133

In November 2023, the ECHA published its investigation report on hazardous substances in childcare products (articles), based on information from 48 different sources. The Agency concluded that carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction (CMR) substances may be present in childcare articles such as toiletries, diapers, car seats, and mattresses. Some metals (e.g., cobalt, lead) and phthalates (e.g., DEHP) were among the most commonly found substances. This report will feed into and support the development of an EU-wide restriction proposal on these substances in childcare articles.134 To protect children’s best interests, the restriction should therefore encompass the widest range of childcare articles possible, including (but not limited to) diapers and nappy-related articles.


Children’s participation in political and democratic life

Children's rights

UNCR:

• Art. 12: Respect for the views of the child, right to be heard.

• Art. 13: Freedom of expression and the right to seek, receive and impart information.

• Art. 14: Freedom of thought.

• Art. 15: Freedom of association and of peaceful assembly.

• Art. 42: Knowledge of rights.

UNCRPD:

• Art. 7.3: Right of children with disabilities to express their views.

Aarhus Convention:

• Art. 6: Public participation in decisions on specific activities.

• Art. 7: Public participation concerning plans, programmes and policies relating to the environment.

• Art. 8: Public participation during the preparation of executive regulations and/or generally applicable legally binding normative instruments.

ECHR:

• Art. 10: Freedom of expression.

• Art. 11: Freedom of assembly and association.

EU Charter:

• Art. 24.1.2: Right of the child to express views.

• Art. 10: Freedom of thought.

• Art. 12: Freedom of assembly and of association.

• Art. 22: Cultural, religious and linguistic diversity.

SDGs:

• Target 16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decisionmaking at all levels.

• Target 16.10: Ensure public access to information (…), in accordance with national legislation and international agreements.

• Target 4.7: Ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and nonviolence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development.


Connections between children's rights and exposure to hazardous chemicals

In all actions concerning children by EU institutions, including those related to their health, the views of the child must be given weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Any decision relating to hazardous chemicals should be taken with reference to these factors.

UNCRC Article 12 enshrines the right of all children to be heard and have their views taken seriously in accordance with their age and maturity. Every child capable of forming their own views has a right to be heard and to influence decision-making processes that may be relevant in their life.

According to the Special Rapporteur Baskut Tuncak, the right to be heard is inextricable from public health and environmental threats such as toxics and pollution. This right is closely linked with the question of consent, and with the phenomenon of children being born “pre-polluted”.135 He called on countries to prevent childhood exposure, in recognition of the right of present and future generations to be heard.136

The 4th thematic area of the EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child regarding “Child-friendly justice”,137 states that in all cases, children should feel comfortable and safe to participate effectively in the proceedings. The Strategy indeed deplored that as it stands today, children's concerns are not sufficiently listened to, and their views are often not considered enough in matters important to them.

Children and young people have been at the forefront of campaigning on the environment, but are frustratingly excluded from decision-making processes.138


Case study: Children’s participation in shaping EU chemicals laws and policies

To prepare the EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child, the perspectives and priorities of more than 10,000 children and young people, from within and outside the EU, were expressed throughout the report Our Europe, Our Rights, Our Future.139

This report outlined that “only one in four children [feels] that their rights are taken seriously” when it comes to the wider society or professionals, such as legal professionals. The report urged the mainstreaming of children’s rights in all EU policies relevant to protecting the environment, including through formal mechanisms to support children’s participation in discussions and decision-making on climate change.

Participating in decision-making on chemicals is particularly difficult for children, their parents, and NGOs defending civil society against harmful substances. Some of the most crucial decisions on health protection against hazardous chemicals are being negotiated and adopted behind closed doors. For instance, the trilogue process—negotiations between the EU Commission, member states (Council), and Parliament on legislative proposals—lacks transparency and is rarely accessible to stakeholders.

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) denounced in 2023 that these decisive negotiations on decisions affecting all EU citizens take place in secret.140 “This opaque nature of the trilogue process is especially beneficial to well-connected and well-funded lobbyists,” CEO warned.141 As a result, civil society, including children, is under-represented and lacks proper access to information.


Socio-economic rights

Children's rights

UNCRC:

• Art. 2: Non-discrimination.

• Art. 18: Parents’ common responsibilities, assistance to parents and provision of childcare services.

• Art. 26: Right to benefit from social security.

• Art. 27.1-3: Standard of living and measures taken, including material assistance and support programmes with regard to nutrition, clothing and housing, to ensure children’s physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development, and to reduce poverty and inequality.

ECHR:

• Art. 8: Right to respect for private and family life.

• Art. 14: Prohibition of discrimination.

European Social Charter:

• Art. 7: Right of children and young persons to protection.

• Art. 11: Right to protection of health.

• Art. 13: Right to social and medical assistance.

• Art. 15: Right of persons with disabilities to independence, social integration, and participation in the life of the community.

• Art. 16: Right of the family to social, legal, and economic protection.

• Art. 17: Right of children and young persons to social, legal, and economic protection (this article of the revised Charter offers protection for children and young persons outside the context of work and addresses the special needs arising from their vulnerability).

• Art. 30: Right to protection against poverty and social exclusion.

• Art. 31: Right to housing (of an "adequate standard," meaning housing that meets acceptable standards with regard to health requirements).

EU Charter:

• Art. 7: Respect for private and family life.

• Art. 9: Right to marry and to found a family (in relation to their parents).

• Art. 21: Non-discrimination.

• Art. 24.3: Right of the child to maintain on a regular basis a personal relationship and direct contact with parents.

• Art. 33: Protection of family and professional life.

• Art. 32: Protection of young people at work.

• Art. 36: Access to services of general economic interest.

• Art. 38: Consumer protection.

SDGs:

• Target 1.1: Eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day.

• Target 1.2: Reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions.

• Target 1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors (as a floor is the lowest acceptable standard for all), and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable.

• Target 1.5: Build the resilience of the poor and those in vulnerable situations and reduce their exposure and vulnerability to climate-related extreme events and other economic, social, and environmental shocks and disasters.

• Target 2.1: End hunger and ensure access by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious, and sufficient food all year round.

• Target 11.1: Ensure access for all to adequate, safe, and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums.

• Target 11.7: Provide universal access to safe, inclusive, and accessible, green, and public spaces, in particular for women and children.


Connections between children's rights and exposure to hazardous chemicals

Despite existing international and EU chemical legislation, hazardous substances are still found in products and the environment and severely infringe those rights which should be protected equally. The EU and its member states fall short in guaranteeing child protection and their best interest.

Exposure to hazardous chemicals follows and feeds into a pattern of systemic discrimination, environmental racism and gender inequality, including in the EU (detailed in the section “Compounded harm to marginalised children” above). As stressed by the High Commissioner on Human Rights and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), pollution - including from hazardous substances - “disproportionately affects persons, groups and peoples in vulnerable situations reflecting both historical and ongoing discrimination, racism, and power imbalances that have given rise to powerful social movements for environmental justice”.142 Chemical pollution is a socio-economic issue, and its impacts are worsened by socio-economic factors, particularly poverty. Discrimination against children is one of the main reasons why their rights are violated. Looking at rights from this perspective can help expose the prejudices and beliefs that lead to unfair treatment. Poverty indeed puts children in a number of potentially high-risk situations.

Furthermore, the UNCRC preamble places special emphasis on the primary caring and protective responsibility of the family. It does so by recognising the fact that children, because of their special vulnerability, need special care and protection; and identifies the family unit as the “natural environment for the growth and wellbeing” of children. To ensure that this responsibility can be fulfilled, article 27 also identifies the State as guarantor of children’s right to an adequate standard of living, which can include material assistance to parents and their children.143 The UNCRC preamble states that the family “should be afforded the necessary protection and assistance so that it can fully assume its responsibilities within the community.”

The need for protection should be understood as States’ obligation to support families so that they can fully assume their responsibilities in ensuring the fulfilment of the rights of all family members, including children.144 States are also responsible for putting an end to discrimination and inequality. UNEP and the High Commissioner for Human Rights stressed that “by disproportionately affecting already marginalised groups including children, indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, women and girls, and persons living in poverty, hazardous substances threaten State obligations and commitments related to non-discrimination and equality”.

To address this systemic issue, States should put an end to the use of hazardous substances as well as ensuring that the victims of contamination have access to justice (further detailed in the dedicated section below). Several measures should be put in place, not only improving the planning of industrial facilities and landfills and the sorting of hazardous substances, but, most of all, preventing hazardous substances from being placed on the market.

Furthermore, all children and their parents should be safe at home, surrounded by non-hazardous products they use in their daily lives. Respect to home and family means a right to live in a home where people are not at risk to be contaminated on a daily basis, including when using pans to cook, sitting on a couch or on the floor, or using household products. However, indoor pollution including via chemicals is a significant concern.

Asking parents who are consumers to change their behaviours is not enough to protect children. It is crucial to tackle the problem at the source, by preventing hazardous chemicals from being placed on the market in the first place. The EU and its member states are responsible for protecting their citizens against harmful products, and that includes tackling exposure to hazardous substances.


Case study: Equal protection of all families

It is a matter of fact that children from the poorest families are more exposed to hazardous substances. For instance, poverty can intensify the risk of exposure to the worst pesticides. Children may help out on family-owned farms where hazardous pesticides can be used.145 Based on estimates for the 2016-2020 period, agriculture accounted for the largest share of children in child labour. For the 5-17 age group as a whole in Europe and Central Asia, more than half of all children in child labour are found in agriculture, primarily consisting of family subsistence and smallholder farming.146 In addition, the poorest communities have less ability to address the health impacts of pesticides. As a study on children’s environmental health in agricultural settings mentioned in 2018, “children in agricultural communities with contamination of soil, water, foods, or air are at risk of receiving higher doses than adult residents. For developmental toxicants, the same dose may have no consequences in an adult yet portend devastating consequences on a foetus or child if exposure occurs in a critical developmental window”.147 Among other drivers worsening the impacts of pesticides on farmers’ children, the access to healthcare is particularly complex in rural areas, as the “long waits at some rural health clinics or limited access to health care may preclude farmworkers and their children from presenting to medical care for suspected pesticide illness”.148

Furthermore, hazardous chemicals are found in children’s and parents’ daily lives, including at home via various exposure routes. Consumer products are far from safe, including in the EU. As relevantly underscored by the project LifeChemBee, which aims to detoxify households, “We generally associate hazardous chemicals with heavy industry and polluted hotspots in the vicinity of chemical plants. However, we encounter many hazardous chemicals even in our homes. This is because cleaning products, cosmetics, and consumer products are responsible for countless pollutants in our own households”.149

Organisations who are members of the European Consumer Association (BEUC) found PFAS in everyday consumer products like food paper wraps, dental floss, and hardshell jackets. The compilation of tests run between 2017 and 2023 also revealed the presence of various chemicals of concern in toys and children’s products. For instance, in baby carriages, car seats, strollers, baby wipes, sunscreen, coloured pencils, toys, highchairs, rubber boots, and running bikes, several hazardous substances damaging children’s health were found.150

More expensive products are not always associated with an increased safety of the substances used in them.151 However, because of their socio-economic background, the poorest families often have less choice in stores, they are more often buying on online marketplaces proposing cheaper products, with a reduced access to information on the products they buy.

Tests run by BEUC’s members revealed heavy metals, EDCs, and persistent chemicals in cheap jewellery, cosmetics for kids, balloons, children’s toys, and cosmetic products for adults. Cheap products often contain more hazardous substances, especially when it comes to products sold online.

Many substances in products sold online are restricted or not authorised at all on the EU market, but they end up in households, outlining the failure of the EU customs and market surveillance system. As underlined by BEUC, 7 out of 17 cheap jewellery items purchased by Forbrugerrådet Tænk from online marketplaces did not live up to the legal requirements. Some of the tested products exceeded the legal limit of nickel, an allergenic substance, by 10 to 344 times. Some also contained excessive levels of lead and cadmium, two very hazardous heavy metals.152


Health

Children's rights

UNCRC:

• Art. 3: Best interest of the child.

• Art. 6: The right to life, survival and development.

• Art. 19: Protection from violence and neglect.

• Art. 24: Health and health services, in particular primary health care, combating disease and malnutrition, including within the framework of primary health care, (...) through the provision of adequate nutritious foods and clean drinking water, taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution.

• Art. 33: Measures to protect children from substance abuse.

ECHR:

• Art. 2: Right to life.

European Social Charter:

• Art. 11: Right to protection of health.

• Art. 13: Right to social and medical assistance.

• Art. 31: Right to housing (of an "adequate standard" means housing which is of an acceptable standard with regard to health requirements).

EU Charter:

• Art. 3: Right to integrity of the person.

• Art. 35: Health care.

• Art. 37: Environmental protection.

SDGs:

• Target 2.1: End hunger and ensure access by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious, and sufficient food all year round.

• Target 3.1: Reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 live births.

• Target 3.2: End preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age, with all countries aiming to reduce neonatal mortality to at least as low as 12 per 1,000 live births and under-5 mortality to at least as low as 25 per 1,000 live births.

• Target 6.1: Achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all.

• Target 6.2: Achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and end open defecation, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls and those in vulnerable situations.

• Target 6.b: Support and strengthen the participation of local communities for improving water and sanitation management.

Connections between children's rights and exposure to hazardous chemicals

The right to health is pivotal for the enjoyment of all other human rights and fundamental to a child’s ability to grow, learn, and develop to the best of their potential. But the right to health means more than the bare bones of survival.

Children's right to health is often only seen in terms of malnourishment and vaccinations. However, the right to health encompasses more than just survival. It also includes the right to access information about health, the importance of informed consent, and preserving physical and mental well-being. These principles apply to children as well.

Health and the environment are intrinsically connected. Science and data are clear. As highlighted by a scientific study under the ATHLETE program, environmental exposure during early life plays a pivotal role in children’s health, with consequences lasting throughout their entire life, including adulthood. 153

Baskut Tuncak’s 2016 report to the Human Rights Council was the first thematic report by a Special Rapporteur to emphasise the relevance of the UNCRC to environment protection. He mentioned that because of widespread childhood exposure, the world is witnessing a "silent pandemic" of disease, disability and premature death. 154

For instance, water is a major source of exposure to toxic chemicals and pollutants, in poor and wealthy countries. Childhood exposure to contaminated water involves numerous rights violations, including the right to health and to live in a healthy environment. Securing the right of children to safe drinking water, which is an important component of the right to health, is a challenge that regulatory frameworks must meet, and where rights are violated, they must provide children with the means of getting redress.

Current SR on toxics and human rights Marcos Orellana emphasised in 2022 that “children suffer a silent assault on their right to health, and often on their right to life, when they are exposed to hazardous substances that leach and enter their bodies." He called for better prioritising protection of children, as well as securing people’s access to environmental and health information. 155

In July 2022, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution recognising the access to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a universal human right. 156 With this resolution, the UNGA called on States and businesses to scale up efforts to ensure a healthy environment for all. The resolution recognised that the unsound management of chemicals and waste interferes with the enjoyment of a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, and that environmental damage has negative implications, both direct and indirect, for the effective enjoyment of all human rights, including the right to health.

In its General Comment 26 released in 2023, the Committee on the Rights of the Child set out that children’s right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment "is implicit in the Convention and directly linked to, in particular, the rights to life, survival and development, under article 6, to the highest attainable standard of health, including taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution, under article 24, to an adequate standard of living, under article 27, and to education, under article 28, including the development of respect for the natural environment, under article 29."157


Case study: Pesticide pollution infringes children’s right to health

  • Detailed in our position paper on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Regulation

Exposure to hazardous pesticides is linked to a wide range of children’s rights violations, particularly the right to health. It impacts their health directly as environmental exposure increases risks of diseases, but also in the long term by participating in water contamination, climate change and degradation of food quality.

While the 2009 Directive on sustainable use of pesticides (SUD)158 contributed to reducing the risks and impacts of pesticide use, this legislation has major weaknesses and loopholes leading to daily and continued exposure of children to hazardous pesticides across the EU.

The EEA recently found and stressed that pesticide levels were consistently higher in children than in adults, with children being particularly sensitive to the negative health impacts of chemicals.159

In their report on pesticides published in 2017, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food and Special Rapporteur on toxics and human rights emphasised that children are most vulnerable to pesticide contamination, due to the higher dose per unit of body weight.160 They warned that “exposure to even low levels of pesticides, for example through wind drift or residues on food, may be very damaging to children’s health.” The report also relevantly outlined that “pregnant women who are exposed to pesticides are at higher risk of miscarriage, preterm delivery and birth defect.”

Moreover, pesticides degrade biodiversity,161 as well as the ecosystem on which children and their families depend for food and work.162 Pesticides are readily distributed in watercourses and the soil,163 where they accumulate in animals and plants, including the human food chain. In addition to harming children’s health, ecological degradation caused by harmful substances jeopardises the food security and long-term economic prospects of millions of children around the world, including across the EU.164 Use of harmful pesticides contributes to biodiversity losses and depletion of species richness. Biological quality of greenspace is essential for conservation purposes and benefits to human mental health and psychological wellbeing.165

The continued use of hazardous pesticides not only deteriorates the ecosystems but also the wellbeing of present and future generations.

Pesticides contribute to and worsen climate change, both during their manufacture and after their application.166 The production of synthetic pesticides generates important greenhouse gas emissions, as the vast majority derives from fossil fuels. Several pesticides also emit greenhouse gas emissions after their application.167

While a revision of the EU pesticides rules is needed more than ever to tackle the exposure to hazardous pesticides and put an end to severe children’s rights violations, the European Parliament rejected in November 2023 the draft regulation on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides (SUR).168 Conservative MEPs pushed back against this crucial draft legislation that would have contributed to better upholding children’s rights, including by protecting their health and their environment. The EU committed to uphold human rights, including children’s rights. SUR was a cornerstone proposal and the opportunity to address the shortcomings of the SUD. Efforts to tackle hazardous pesticides must continue in 2024 and beyond, so the EU can finally adopt and implement a clear and binding framework restricting the use of hazardous pesticides, particularly in areas where children live, grow and play.


Education and play

Children's rights

UNCRC:

• Art. 28: Right to education, including vocational training and guidance.

• Art. 29: The aims of education, including education on human rights and civic education as well as the development of respect for the natural environment.

• Art. 30: Cultural rights of children belonging to indigenous and minority groups.

• Art. 31: Rest, play, leisure, recreation and cultural and artistic activities.

UNCRPD:

• Art. 24: Right of persons with disabilities to education and full development.

ECHR Protocol:

• Art. 2: Right to education.

European Social Charter:

• Art. 13: Right to social and medical assistance.

• Art. 15: Right of persons with disabilities to independence, social integration, and participation in the life of the community.

• Art. 16: Right of the family to social, legal, and economic protection.

• Art. 17: Right of children and young persons to social, legal, and economic protection (Revised Charter offers protection for children and young persons outside the context of work and addresses the special needs arising from their vulnerability.).

• Art. 30: Right to protection against poverty and social exclusion.

EU Charter

• Art. 14: Right to education.

SDGs:

• Target 4.1: Ensure that all girls and boys complete free, equitable, and quality primary and secondary education leading to relevant and effective learning outcomes.

• Target 4.2: Ensure that all girls and boys have access to quality early childhood development, care, and pre-primary education so that they are ready for primary education.

• Target 4.4: Substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs, and entrepreneurship.

• Target 4.5: Eliminate gender disparities in education and ensure equal access to all levels of education and vocational training for the vulnerable, including persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples, and children in vulnerable situations.

• Target 4.6: Ensure that all youth (…) achieve literacy and numeracy.

• Target 4.7: Ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship, and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development.

• Target 4.8: Build and upgrade education facilities that are child, disability, and gender-sensitive and provide safe, non-violent, inclusive, and effective learning environments for all.


Connections between children's rights and exposure to hazardous chemicals

Exposure to hazardous chemicals can significantly impair brain functions, with long-term effects on IQ levels, and ultimately on the capacity of every child to learn. Exposure to hazardous chemicals is intrinsically linked with difficulties in learning, since such exposure severely impairs brain development. IQ loss impacts children’s development, and exposure to hazardous chemicals thus contributes to difficulties in accessing, enjoying, and benefiting from education and training. It can be much more complex for children to achieve literacy and numeracy. Scientific studies showed that EDCs are probably responsible for IQ loss and associated intellectual disability, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. 169 IQ loss also entails massive economic loss for all countries, as studies demonstrated that the effects of chemical exposure on the IQ level of the population can impact the global economy.170

Here’s the text with the requested format for the footnote:

Moreover, article 31 of the CRC enshrines the right of the child to rest and leisure, to engage in play and recreational activities appropriate to the age of the child and to participate freely in cultural life and the arts.

Such a right should be enjoyed by all children, without the risk of being exposed to harmful substances. Children's right to leisure and recreation also means the right to play safely. In 2013, the Committee on the Rights of the Child outlined several issues stemming from the mass marketing and commercialisation of play. The Committee was concerned that many children and their families were exposed to increasing levels of unregulated marketing by toy and game manufacturers. They were pressured to purchase a growing number of products which may be harmful to their development or incompatible with creative play, for example (...) toys containing dangerous chemicals or parts.171


Case study: Toy safety in the EU

The existing 2009 Toy Safety Directive (TSD)172 established and enforced safety measures for children’s toys sold in the EU. However, it did not prevent severe children’s rights violations from happening, including their right to play, alongside their right to health and bodily integrity. Many harmful substances, including suspected and known EDCs, are still present in toys. In 2018, the Czech NGO Arnika found significant levels of toxic brominated dioxins in plastic toys,173 including PBDEs and PBDDs/Fs, which are EDCs that may impact children’s hormone levels, affect brain development, damage the immune system and foetus, or induce carcinogenesis.

In 2021, the EU’s Safety Gate rapid alert system found that, out of the 2,142 alerts it received, the most notified product categories were “motor vehicles” and “toys,” one of the main concerns for safety of toys pertaining to the presence of hazardous chemicals. Similarly, in 2022, 2,117 notifications were sent to the Safety Gate, and toys were still among the most notified product categories.174

In 2023, the Danish Consumer Council found that bisphenols were present in 60% of 121 tested children’s products. Known or suspected EDCs were found in 11 out of 20 tested teething toys.175 The same year, the Dutch organisation Tegengif analysed plastic toys placed on the Dutch market.176 Several chemicals found in the tested toys are identified by ECHA as substances of very high concern and associated with hormone disruption, reduced fertility, and cancer. The study revealed that phthalates, BHT, and Triphenyl phosphate could be found in very popular toys, as well as DEHtP and DINCH present in concentrations exceeding levels considered safe.

Such a far-reaching contamination177 happens because of permissive regulation. The existing directive only prohibits CMR substances and sets limit values for certain substances in toys intended for children under 36 months or intended to be put in the mouth. In 2020, the TSD evaluation unveiled major shortcomings,178 including on the protection against harmful chemicals, as TSD does not adequately respond to the latest scientific knowledge.

Delivering on its Chemicals Strategy, the European Commission proposed in 2023 a regulation to reform the existing rules on toy safety.179 For the first time in EU law, the EU Commission proposed to ban both known and suspected EDCs from an entire category of products, in this case toys. This is an ambitious move paving the way for better protection of children across the EU. Additionally, the proposal suggested banning chemicals which knowingly affect respiratory systems or are toxic to specific organs. It also proposed to address the cocktail effect of chemicals, to better assess and manage their combined impacts. As such, the proposal for a Toy Safety Regulation is the chance for the EU to step up and deliver on its legally binding commitments to international and EU children’s rights frameworks.


Combating violence against children and child protection

Children's rights

UNCRC:

• Art. 19: Abuse and neglect.

• Art. 20: Children deprived of a family environment.

• Art. 24.3: Measures to prohibit and eliminate all forms of harmful practices, including, but not limited to, female genital mutilation and early and forced marriages.

• Art. 32: Economic exploitation, including child labour with specific reference to applicable minimum ages.

• Art. 36: Other forms of exploitation.

• Art. 39: Measures to promote the physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims.

UNCRPD:

• Art. 16: Freedom from exploitation, violence and abuse. EU Charter:

• Art. 1: Human dignity.

• Art. 3: Right to integrity of the person.

• Art. 4: Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

• Art. 24.1: Right of the child to protection and care.

European Social Charter:

• Art. 7: Right of children and young persons to protection.

• Art. 11: Right to protection of health.

• Art. 13: Right to social and medical assistance.

• Art. 16: Right of the family to social, legal and economic protection.

• Art. 17: Right of children and young persons to social, legal and economic protection (Article of the Revised Charter offers protection for children and young persons outside the context of work and addresses the special needs arising from their vulnerability.).

SDGs:

• Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all.

• Target 16.10: (…) Protect fundamental freedoms, in accordance with national legislation and international agreement.


Connections between children's rights and exposure to hazardous chemicals

Practices which violate children's physical integrity, without the child’s free and informed consent—regardless of age—are a violation of the child's physical integrity and dignity. 180 Everyone, including children, has the right to autonomy and self-determination over their own body, and the only person with the right to make a decision about one’s body is oneself—no one else. This is the principle of bodily integrity, which upholds everyone’s right to be free from acts against their body which they did not consent to.

Children are especially vulnerable to such exposure and are not in a position to express consent to being exposed to harmful substances. The period where exposure is the most harmful occurs before birth and after birth at the earliest stages of life, when children are unable to speak up for and defend themselves, or give consent.

Exposure to chemicals is in itself an act of violence against children, to both their health and the environment, hence violating children’s integrity. In 2023, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child stressed that “environmental degradation (...) is a form of structural violence against children and can cause social collapse in communities and families” 181 . Children continue to be born "pre-polluted," and are denied their right to bodily integrity before they can even walk 182 . International law grants no derogation from the right to physical integrity 183 , and the former SR on toxics and human rights Baskut Tuncak explained that human exposure to toxic substances constitutes an intrusion, whether it’s acute poisoning or low-level exposure to toxic substances. He emphasised that “childhood exposure to toxics occurs without the child’s (or parent’s) consent. Even if a parent were somehow able to identify every product and possible source of exposure to toxics that might harm their child, they are often powerless to do anything about it, particularly when it involves food, water or air pollution.” The SR added that young children lack the physical and/or mental ability to vocalise opinions and understand the dangers and potential consequences of toxics until long after harm has been inflicted.


Case study: Early exposure to glyphosate

Taking the case of glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide, children are exposed to this hazardous substance during their entire childhood, via breast milk, food, water, and environmental pollution, but they are also exposed to it before their birth184. A link between the mother’s exposure to glyphosate and prenatal damage to a child was recognised by a French authority (“Commission d’indemnisation des enfants victimes d’une exposition prénatale”) in 2023. The boy, now aged 16 years old, was born with physical malformation. A causal link was recognised between his mother’s exposure to glyphosate during her pregnancy and his medical condition185.

Glyphosate has demonstrated harmful effects on the rates of youth liver disease and metabolic disorders, which dramatically increased over the decades. According to a recent study published in 2023, children exposed to glyphosate are more likely in early adulthood to have a collection of symptoms that increase the risk of heart disease, diabetes, and stroke186.

Moreover, a scientific study presented in October 2023 revealed evidence of the link between popular products containing glyphosate (e.g. the weed-killing Roundup) with cancer in young rats, even when the concentration of this substance is complying with the levels currently considered safe187. Research found that “low doses of glyphosate-based herbicides at exposure levels within the current acceptable regulatory standards caused a statistically significant dose-related trend in leukaemia incidence in young rats, including those younger than one year”.

In October 2023, Inserm and Paris Cité University found that children living near large vineyards are more likely to develop leukaemia. For every 10% increase in the area covered by vines within a 1,000 metre perimeter, the risk of lymphoblastic leukaemia increased by almost 10%188.

Despite the danger of glyphosate for children and their families, the EU Commission decided in November 2023 to extend the authorisation of the use of glyphosate in the EU for ten years189. This authorisation renewal leaves the door open to continuous children’s rights infringements, including violation of their bodily integrity, across all states.


Child-friendly justice

Children's rights

UNCRC:

• Art. 12: Right to be heard ICCPR:

• Art. 2(3): Right to remedy

• Art. 14(1): Access to justice

Aarhus Convention:

• Art. 9: Access to justice

ECHR:

• Art. 10: Freedom of expression

• Art. 11: Freedom of assembly and association

• Art. 13: Right to an effective remedy

EU Charter:

• Art. 6: Right to liberty and security

• Art. 24.1.2: Right of the child to express his/her views

• Article 43: European Ombudsman

• Art. 45: Freedom of movement and of residence

• Art. 47: Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial

SDGs:

• Target 10.7: Facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementation of planned and well-managed migration policies

• Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all

• Target 16.10: (…) Protect fundamental freedoms, in accordance with national legislation and international agreements


Connections between children's rights and exposure to hazardous chemicals

In 2016, the then Chair of the Committee on the Rights of the Child Dr. Benyam Mezmur stressed that “if the fundamental rights of children are violated, it is critical that children or those acting on their behalf have the recourse, both in law and in practice, to obtain a remedy to cease, prohibit and/or compensate for the violation. Failing to deliver redress to a child for a human rights violation is a particularly telling sign that a legal system or a society is falling short of regarding children as rights-bearers”. 190

Access to justice is extremely difficult for children and their parents in the EU regarding chemical pollution. The main chemicals legislation, meaning REACH and CLP, do not provide access to justice in case of chemical pollution violating those regulations.

This contradicts the international and EU legally binding frameworks but also one of the key goals of the EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child. As part of its thematic area “Child-friendly justice” 191 , the Strategy supports justice systems that uphold the rights and needs of children. It states that in all cases, judicial systems in Europe need to be adapted to the specific needs of children and must respect their rights. It deplored that children currently face “difficulties to access justice and to obtain effective remedies for violations of their rights, including at European and international level”. For instance, children with disabilities experience difficulties due to reduced accessibility of justice systems and judicial proceedings, and lack accessible information on rights and remedies.

In 2020, the Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) highlighted the impacts business activities can have on the communities and the environment.192 FRA reiterated that not only should business always be conducted with respect for human rights, but States also have a duty to ensure that business conduct does not violate human rights as well as to provide access to effective remedy for those whose rights are abused. FRA stressed that the effectiveness of judicial remedies is often hampered by restrictive rules on legal standing, evidence barriers, high legal costs and the length of proceedings.193 FRA recommended that the EU and member states provide for effective collective redress and representative action beyond consumer protection to other cases of business-related human rights abuse. As for the burden of proof, FRA called on the EU to encourage member states to consider shifting the burden of proof in cases where fundamental rights of individuals are infringed by corporate activity.

In 2016, the Special Rapporteur on toxics and human rights warned that the “vast majority of child victims of air pollution, food and water contamination, toxic chemicals and pesticides are not compensated. Even in cases where rights are clearly infringed and the relevant businesses or other actors identified, realising an effective remedy and ensuring corporate accountability for harms due to toxic chemicals or pollution has proven extremely difficult around the world”.194 As the Special Rapporteur accurately explained, the main hurdles pertain to “the lack of awareness among victims that their diseases could have been caused by childhood exposure to toxic chemicals or pollution; the burden of proof placed on children, including the need to establish causation; fundamental information that has not been generated or is confidential about the hazards and uses of substances; the challenge of identifying perpetrators; weak or non-existent legislation; the costs of legal representation for plaintiffs; endless appeals processes; confidential out-of-court settlements; and the use of subsidiaries or contractual relationships to shield corporate liability”. Children and their families are too often required to prove that a hazardous chemical caused their injuries, and it is not up to the businesses to prove that they did no harm. The Special Rapporteur warned that “even unquestionably toxic sites of contamination, whether from the dirty legacy of businesses or the toxic remnants of war, escape remediation and accountability that could prevent future human rights violations”.

In 2023, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child also addressed the issue of the burden of proof in its General Comment 26 on children's rights and the environment. The Committee accurately pointed out that “to enhance accountability and promote children’s access to justice in environmental matters, States should explore options for shifting the onerous burden of proof from child plaintiffs to establish causation in the face of numerous variables and information deficits”.195


Case study: REACH and access to justice

There are multiple scandals of chemical companies not complying with their obligations under REACH and CLP, leading to massive environmental pollution. It entails severe human rights violations, including children’s rights. But victims have no way to access justice and ask for remediation when infringements happen, since REACH does not have a single provision on access to justice and remedies.

The lack of access to justice in the main EU chemicals legislation is poorly compensated by national mechanisms in the EU member states. Access to justice and the capacity of children to access legal actions, redress and remedies suffer from important discrepancies across the EU. CRIN is elaborating country reports looking at whether the laws and policies in 45 countries around the world make it possible for children to access their environmental rights196. Among other questions, the reports ponder whether there is any specific national policy addressing childhood exposure to toxic substances, and if so, what is considered a safe level of exposure and what is the process for determining safe levels of exposure.

For instance, in France, apart from a few provisions, there is no clear specific national policy addressing childhood exposure to toxic substances setting forth standards for environmental harms197. Sweden has not adopted a specific national policy addressing childhood exposure to toxic substances either198. Most countries are lagging behind in considering childhood exposure and enabling victims to access justice.

A few member states have made some progress. For example, in Finland, the ongoing National Chemicals Programme (2022–2035) recognises the importance of a chemical-safe environment and of limiting exposure, especially to protect the health of children and young people. Further, it considers families with children and young people a target of communication by public authorities on issues relevant to chemical safety199.

However, recognition of the impacts of hazardous chemicals on children and their guarantees of access to justice and remedies remain insufficient across all member states.


Digital and information society

Children's rights

UNCRC:

• Art. 17: Access to information from a diversity of sources and protection from material harmful to a child’s wellbeing.

Aarhus Convention:

• Art. 4: Access to environmental information.

• Art. 5: Collection and dissemination of environmental information.

ECHR:

• Art. 10: Freedom of expression (include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information).

EU Charter:

• Art. 11: Freedom of expression and information.

SDGs:

• Target 4.7: Ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development.

• Target 16.10: Ensure public access to information (…), in accordance with national legislation and international agreements.


Connections between children's rights and exposure to hazardous chemicals

Children very often have difficulty in accessing clear and comprehensible information, especially when it comes to chemicals. Children need age-appropriate information to develop their own perspectives and enable them to make informed decisions. 200 Parents must also access fully transparent information so they can take action when their children are too young to understand and protect themselves.

In 2023, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child flagged that “access to information is essential for enabling children and their parents or caregivers to comprehend the potential effects of environmental harm on children’s rights. It is also a crucial prerequisite for realising the rights of children to express their views, to be heard and to effective remedy regarding environmental matters.” 201

Regarding chemicals, information is extremely difficult to access. For years, NGOs have been warning that the processes of revising the EU regulations, as well as evaluating and authorising chemicals to be sold in the EU market, take place in revolving doors. Furthermore, there are cases of disproportionate restrictions on children's access to information which are defended on child protection grounds. Children must indeed be protected against certain information that would be too complex or emotionally damaging. However, access to honest and objective information appropriate to their age and capacity is a prerequisite for all children’s rights and should be part of any child protection strategy. Children, on account of their ages, and their parents, have the right to know which chemicals are being used in their products, and what harmful effects they potentially present.

From a children’s rights perspective, family is an arrangement which provides care, nurture, and development. Considering its responsibility and obligations to the protection of children, families should be able to know which chemicals are coming into contact with children and what their effects are, so they can choose not to buy products that would harm them.


Case study: Exposure to titanium dioxide

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is found in many household products such as sunscreen and other products intended for children’s uses. The substance has been recognised as a suspected carcinogen to humans.202

In 2019, the then Special Rapporteur on toxics Baskut Tuncak addressed a letter to the EU Commission203 expressing concern about a proposed amendment to a regulation on TiO2 labelling that would result in certain forms of TiO2 circumventing the requirement of bearing cancer warnings. He stressed that withholding information from workers, consumers, and the general public about suspected cancer-causing properties of TiO2 would deprive them of essential information that is a human right. “This exemption from the warning requirement may amount to denying access to information about potential carcinogenic properties of TiO2 in most titanium-dioxide-containing products in common use,” the Special Rapporteur denounced. He deplored that the private sector failed to fully respect human rights and urged the EU Commission to better integrate human rights considerations in the management of toxic chemicals and wastes more generally.

This TiO2 case was an opportunity for the Special Rapporteur to remind how essential accessing information on chemicals is to uphold human rights, since “information is an enabler of many human rights that are implicated by hazardous substances and waste.” Baskut Tuncak relevantly outlined that “information is crucial both to prevent human rights violations and abuses resulting from exposure to hazardous substances and wastes, and to realise the rights of victims to an effective remedy.” But vital information on hazardous substances and wastes (including on exposure levels, hazardous properties, etc.) is still very often unavailable and/or inaccessible.


Global dimension

Children's rights

All above-mentioned conventions and legislation:

UNCRC

• ICCPR

• Aarhus Convention

• ECHR

• EU Charter

• European Social Charter

• SDGs



Connections between children's rights and exposure to hazardous chemicals

The EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child stresses that “the EU plays a leading role in supporting children globally, by strengthening access to quality, safe and inclusive education, basic services, health, humanitarian aid and in protecting them in violent conflict.” 204 However, the reality is that the EU involvement in guaranteeing that children’s rights protection against harmful contamination worldwide is far off these promises. As it stands today, EU companies are still allowed to export hazardous chemicals that are prohibited in the EU to other countries. This double standard enables EU businesses to sell harmful chemicals that will degrade the environment and impact children’s health around the world.

The export of hazardous chemicals banned in the EU is in itself an economic issue, creating howling economic injustice and massive disparities between EU member states and non-EU countries. “Wealthier nations tend to create double standards that allow the trade and use of prohibited substances in parts of the world where regulations are less stringent, externalising the health and environmental impacts on the most vulnerable,” former Special Rapporteur on toxics, Baskut Tuncak, stressed in 2020. 205 The continued use of harmful chemicals entails significant environmental degradation and health costs that will eventually reverberate on the financial status and resilience of healthcare systems in those countries importing chemicals banned in the EU.


Case study: Export ban

  • Detailed in CRIN's brief

Member States have been continuously exporting hazardous chemicals to non-EU countries despite their bans under the EU legislation. In 2018 and 2019, EU member states and the United Kingdom approved the export of a total of 140,908 tonnes of pesticides banned from application in EU fields because of unacceptable health and environmental risks.206

Investigations in 2023 showed that EU countries continue to export chlorpyrifos.207 This pesticide is banned in the EU, and known to cause particular harmful health damages to children and foetuses. Pre and post-birth exposure to chlorpyrifos is linked to adverse neurodevelopmental impacts for children. Despite such scientific evidence, in the second semester of 2022, European companies issued notifications for the export of more than 380 tonnes of chlorpyrifos, and they expect to export equivalent amounts in 2023.208 Between January and September 2022, more than 7,400 tons of hazardous substances, such as the prohibited fungicide Picoxystrobin, were shipped from France to non-EU countries including Brazil, Ukraine, Russia, Mexico, India and Algeria. French authorities approved up to 155 requests for authorization of about 15 chemicals banned in the EU.209

 
 
 
 

***

Footnotes

103 Elgaronline, Article 3 TEU.


104 EU Commission, EU action on the rights of the child.


105 EU Commission, UNCRPD.


106 European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 (amended version).


107 European Social Charter, 1996 (amended version).


108 UNCRC, Article 4: Implementation of rights.


109 For instance, the proposal for a Toy Safety Regulation (TSR) and its impact assessment mainly focus on the achievement of the SDGs. Mentions of children’s rights, references to the UNCRC and acknowledgements of intersectionality between harmful chemicals and children’s rights violations are not sufficiently embedded in the proposal.


110 EU Commission, The EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child, COM(2021) 142 final, March 2021.


111 UN Sustainable Development Goals, adopted by all UN member states in 2015. The SDGs play a role in determining the global approach to international sustainable development, but they are not legally binding and despite an apparent focus on children’s interests they fail to recognise children’s rights explicitly. In neglecting a rights-based framework, the overall narrative of the SDGs is one in which children will continue to be seen as objects of charity rather than as holders of human rights.


112 Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: EU strategy on the rights of the child, COM(2021) 142 final, March 2021: This Annex presents in detail the relevant rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the goals and targets of the UN Sustainable Development Goals protected and promoted by the different strands of the EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child.


113 UNICEF, Innocenti Report Card 17: Places and spaces environments and children’s well-being, 2022.


114 Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, OJEU, December 2007.


115 See UNCRC Articles 6 and 24.


116 See UNCRC Article 3.


117 Report of the SR on the Implications for Human Rights of the Environmentally Sound Management and Disposal of Hazardous Substances and Wastes, A/HRC/33/41, August 2016.


118 Human Rights Council Resolution 45/30, October 2020.


119 Opening Remarks, United Nations Special Rapporteur on toxics and human rights, Marcos A. Orellana, at the 76th Session of the UN General Assembly, May 2022.


120 Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 26 on children’s rights and the environment, with a special focus on climate change, CRC/C/GC/26, August 2023.


121 Ibid.


122 UNICEF, WHO, Born too soon - 150 million babies born preterm in the last decade, May 2023.


123 EFCNI, The situation and the challenges with regard to preterm birth in Europe, 2018.


124 Kolan, A.S, Hall, J.M., Association of preterm birth and exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals, January 2023; Réseau Environnement Santé, Mortalité infantile, prématurité : l’urgence d’agir, June 2023.


125 Welch BM, et al. Associations between prenatal urinary biomarkers of phthalate exposure and preterm birth: A pooled study of 16 US cohorts, July 2022.


126 European Human Biomonitoring Initiative HBM4EU, Policy brief on phthalates, June 2022.


127 Annex XV Restriction Report, dossier submitted by ANSES, Proposal for a restriction on several substances in single-use baby diapers, December 2021.


128 ANSES, Sécurité des couches pour bébé: Avis révisé de l’Anses, Rapport d’expertise collective, January 2019.


129 ClientEarth, EEB, HEAL and Zero Waste Europe, Press release: Experts highly concerned as EU body rejects proposal to exclude hazardous chemicals in diapers, December 2021.


130 Ibid.


131 ECHA, Risks from chemicals in baby diapers not demonstrated, September 2021.


132 EEB, Babies exposed to highly toxic nappies face severe disease threat later in life, July 2022; ECHA, Risks from chemicals in baby diapers not demonstrated, September 2021. As outlined by the EEB, ECHA’s risk assessment committee found that “…it is not possible to conclude that there are no potential risks from these substances in single-use diapers…” and the chemicals “…should be kept to a level as low as possible/feasible, and preferably not be present at all.”


133 HEAL, Restriction on harmful chemicals in single-use diapers: an opportunity to protect children’s health that Europe is on the verge of missing, July 2022; Opinion from MEPs Maria Arena, Anja Hazekamp, Tilly Metz, Frédérique Ries, Are there dangerous chemicals in disposable nappies in EU?, July 2022; EEB, Babies exposed to highly toxic nappies face severe disease threat later in life, July 2022.


134 ECHA, ECHA’s investigation finds toxic chemicals present in childcare products, November 2023.


135 Danish Protection Agency, Exposure of children and unborn children to selected chemical substances, 2017; Govarts, E. et al., Combined effects of prenatal exposures to environmental chemicals on birth weight, May 2016; Balbus J.M., et al. Early-life prevention of noncommunicable diseases, Lancet, 2013.


136 Report of the SR on the Implications for Human Rights of the Environmentally Sound Management and Disposal of Hazardous Substances and Wastes, A/HRC/33/41, August 2016.


137 EU Commission, Thematic area 4, Child-friendly justice.


138 CRIN, Children’s Access to Environmental Justice: A project exploring how the law protects - or fails to protect - children’s environmental rights.


139 UNICEF, mandated by the EU Commission, Our Europe, Our Rights, Our Future, February 2021.


140 CEO, Sign the petition for trilogue transparency, February 2023.


141 Ibid.


142 OHCHR, UNEP, Human rights and hazardous substances: Key messages, July 2021.


143 CRIN, Submission to the OHCHR on children's right to an adequate standard of living, October 2015.


144 Ibid.


145 Council of Europe, Commissioner for Human Rights, Child labour in Europe: a persisting challenge, August 2013; International Labour Organisation (ILO), Child labour statistical profile: Europe and Central Asia, based on the ILO and UNICEF, Child Labour: Global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward, Geneva and New York, 2021.


146 Ibid.


147 Catherine Karr, Children’s environmental health in agricultural settings, May 2018.


148 Ibid.


149 LIFE Chemicals Ambassadors for Europe, a New LIFE project detoxifies Europe’s households.


150 BEUC, Ubiquitous but preventable: Harmful chemicals in everyday consumer products, Compilation of tests by consumer organisations between 2017 and 2023 underscores need for better EU chemicals legislation, October 2023.


151 Ibid.


152 Ibid.


153 ATHLETE, New study provides a unique resource for understanding how environmental exposures in early life affect our health, November 2022.


154 Report of the SR on the Implications for Human Rights of the Environmentally Sound Management and Disposal of Hazardous Substances and Wastes, A/HRC/33/41, August 2016.


155 OHCHR, Opening Remarks, United Nations Special Rapporteur on toxics and human rights, Marcos A. Orellana, at the 76th Session of the UN General Assembly, May 2022.


156 UNGA Resolution, The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, A/76/L.75, July 2022.


157 Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 26 on children’s rights and the environment, with a special focus on climate change, CRC/C/GC/26, August 2023.


158 Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides.


159 EEA, More action needed in the EU to reduce the impacts of chemical pesticides, April 2023.


160 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, A/HRC/34/48, January 2017.


161 Stanislas Rigal et al., Farmland practices are driving bird population decline across Europe, May 2023.


162 International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), Agriculture at a crossroads - Global report, 2009.


163 FAO, ITPS, GSBI, CBD, EC, State of knowledge of soil biodiversity - Status, challenges and potentialities, Report, 2020; Mandal et al., Chapter 7: Impact of agrochemicals on soil health, 2020.


164 FAO, The biodiversity that is crucial for our food and agriculture is disappearing by the day, February 2019.


165 Lee K. et al., Connecting biodiversity with mental health and wellbeing - A review of methods and disciplinary perspectives, May 2022.


166 PAN North America, Pesticides and climate change: A vicious cycle, Winter 2022-2023.


167 Ibid. “Some pesticides are themselves greenhouse gases. The fumigant sulfuryl fluoride (used to fumigate commodities during transport and storage), is a powerful greenhouse gas. Emitting just one ton (0.91 tonnes) of sulfuryl fluoride is the equivalent of emitting 4,780 tons (4,336 tonnes) of CO2.”


168 European Parliament, Press Release, No majority in Parliament for legislation to curb use of pesticides, November 2023; EDC Free Coalition, EDC-Free Europe partners react to European Parliament’s vote against SUR, November 2023.


169 Olsson, I-M., et al., The cost of inaction - A Socioeconomic analysis of costs linked to effects of endocrine disrupting substances on male reproductive health, 2014; Bellanger, M., et al., Neurobehavioral deficits, diseases, and associated costs of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the EU, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2015.


170 Ibid.


171 Committee on the Rights of the Child, General comment No. 17: The right of the child to rest, leisure, play, recreational activities, cultural life and the arts (Article 31), March 2013.


172 EU Commission, Toy Safety in the EU: The Toy Safety Directive 2009/48/EC.


173 Arnika, Toxic soup: Dioxins in plastic toys, November 2018.


174 EU Commission, Safety Gate: chemical substances top the annual list of health hazards for non-food products, March 2023.


175 Forbrugerrådet Tænks - Danish Consumer Council THINK Chemicals, Bisphenols should be banned, May 2023.


176 Tegengif, Populair kinderspeelgoed bevat giftige stoffen, 2023.


177 Behnisch, P. et al, Global survey of dioxin- and thyroid hormone-like activities in consumer products and toys, Environment International, August 2023.


178 EU Commission, Evaluation of the Toy Safety Directive, November 2020.


179 EU Commission, Protecting children from unsafe toys and strengthening the Single Market – revision of the Toy Safety Directive.


180 CRIN, Issues - Bodily integrity.


181 Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 26 on children’s rights and the environment, with a special focus on climate change, CRC/C/GC/26, August 2023.


182 Report of the SR on the Implications for Human Rights of the Environmentally Sound Management and Disposal of Hazardous Substances and Wastes, A/HRC/33/41, August 2016, Section D. Right to physical and mental integrity.


183 Ibid and Human Rights Committee, General comment No. 20, para. 3, Forty-fourth session, 1992.


184 International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC Monograph on Glyphosate.


185 The Connexion, Boy, 16, compensated in France after mother’s exposure to glyphosate, October 2023.


186 Eskenazi, B. et al. Association of lifetime exposure to glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) with liver inflammation and metabolic syndrome at young adulthood: findings from the CHAMACOS Study, March 2023; Raphael, K., Kids’ glyphosate exposure linked to liver disease and metabolic syndrome, Environmental Health News, March 2023.


187 Global Glyphosate Study, Results presented in Bologna in October 2023, reported by The New Lede, Glyphosate cancer findings of “extreme concern” as Europe weighs reauthorization of pesticide, October 2023.


188 Inserm, Une étude de l’Inserm s’intéresse au lien entre le risque de leucémie pédiatrique et le fait d’habiter à proximité de vignes, October 2023.


189 Le Monde, European Commission faces criticism for glyphosate reauthorization, November 2023.


190 CRIN, Rights, Remedies and Representation: Global report on access to justice for children, 2016.


191 European Commission, Thematic area 4, Child-friendly justice.


192 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Business and human rights – Access to remedy, October 2020.


193 The FRA study mentioned a relevant third-country case study of chemical pollution affecting the rights—especially children’s rights—to health and life, as well as the right to an effective remedy and fair trial. This chemical pollution case involved nearly 800 people in Chile suing the Swedish mining company Boliden for damages after the company exported a pile of toxic waste to Chile in the 1980s. For several years, children played on the pile, which contained large amounts of arsenic and lead. In the 1990s, many people in the affected city developed serious illnesses, including (but not limited to) chronic coughing, aching joints, and cancer. The mining company Boliden argued that the damages should be paid by the Chilean authorities. Several District and Supreme Courts dismissed the case, referring to the period of limitation; and eventually ordered the victims to pay the costs of the defendants.


194 Report of the SR on the Implications for Human Rights of the Environmentally Sound Management and Disposal of Hazardous Substances and Wastes, A/HRC/33/41, August 2016.


195 Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 26 on children’s rights and the environment, with a special focus on climate change, CRC/C/GC/26, August 2023.


196 CRIN, Children’s Access to Environmental Justice: Country reports project (ongoing).


197 CRIN, Country report on children’s access to environmental justice in France, April 2022.


198 CRIN, Country report on children’s access to environmental justice in Sweden, October 2022.


199 CRIN, Country report on children’s access to environmental justice in Finland, August 2023.


200 CRIN's paper Access Denied: Protect children - end censorship.

201 Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 26 on children’s rights and the environment, with a special focus on climate change, CRC/C/GC/26, August 2023.


202 ECHA, Substance Infocard, EC number: 236-675-5, CAS number: 13463-67-7 (last consulted: November 2023).


203 Letter of the Special Rapporteur on toxics and human rights Baskut Tuncak to the European Commission, OL OTH 21/2019, April 2019.


204 Thematic area 6 of the EU strategy on the Rights of the Child EU actions supporting, protecting and empowering children globally, including during crisis and conflict, March 2021.


205 OHCHR Special Procedures, States must stop exporting unwanted toxic chemicals to poorer countries, says UN expert, July 2020.


206 Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Report, Imports and exports: banned but sold anyway, October 2022.


207 Unearthed and Public Eye Joint Investigation, Europe shipping banned pesticide linked to child brain damage to Global South, March 2023.


208 Ibid.


209 Unearthed and Public Eye Joint Investigation, France still exporting prohibited pesticides, despite landmark ban, November 2022.